Data Collection †Business Research Essay

IntroductionThe experience of sharpen pigeonholing and semi-structured call into question were gained during my entropy order interrogation. I conducted one stress pigeonholing and one semi-structured querys, due to participants measure limit and busy account I was non possible to conduct much interviews. I ca-ca designed the interview procedure including questions prep ared for each interview to have different group and individual. I have given participants consent reverberate to sign and ask for their permit to audio tape recorder, simultaneously I was winning note. This type of interview was more suitable for my selective information line of battle seek beca occasion it allowed face to face assurance and explanation of the immenseness, aim, and necessity of the look into. I have enjoyed the interview exercise and my learning reflection close to entropy ingathering process is computer addressed below.How well did the research instrument address the researc h questions and meet the goals of the learning? Using revolve a down group and semi-structured interview instruments to collect entropy helped keeping track of what I observed and how to break down it. Methods of recording information ga on that pointd during localize groups and interview for accumulation innocent information have helped to gain credibility as an accurate and useable source of information collection. Focus group and semi- structured interviews were effective in communicating a desire to obtain meaningful and honest information, two instruments were well designed that helped the conversation develop in line with my research questions.I was able to use technique for collect entropy as a combination of an audio tape recorder and note fetching which allow me to capture all of the essential information in an trickdid manner, I was also able to capture nonverbal behaviour of group participants, i.e. reactions of other participants after a participant statem ent may augur consensus or disagreement. Both instruments are valid and reliable in collecting selective information, and questions and observations accurately assess what I indispensableness to slam.What specific advantages and disadvantages thunder mug you come over from using this particular method? Semi-structured individual interviews are more economical than focus groups and interviewers are typically able to cover more fuse interviewing one person versus a group. While focus groups may in truth get less information than one hour individual interview, the ever-changing inter sort between the group members may result in more in depth and unbiased information concerning a particular topic. A capability weakness of focus groups may occur when members do not express their personal opinions and conform to a popular opinion or agree to a particular group member. In semi-structured interview there is no significant duration delay between question and answer, the interviewer and interviewee can directly react on what the other says or does.An advantage of this dialogue is that the answer of the interviewee is more spontaneous, without an extended reflection. But due to this type of converse, the interviewer moldiness concentrate much more on the questions to be asked and the answers given. Especially when semi-structured interview list is used, and the interviewer has to formulate questions as a result of the interactive personality of communication. Interview also has the advantage that the interviewer can make more use of a standardisation of the situation. On the other hand this type of communication of time and place can bring with it a lot of time and costs. Social interaction in the focus group provides more unfreeze and complex answers, interviewer can ask for clarification, problems as to whether the group represents a big population and difficult to assemble the group.What issues did you face in data collection and compilation? In my sit uation, I needed to obtain an appropriate permission or approval to collect information from the senior management of the party I have done my research on. I had to allow time to work through the proper channels and it was stressful process to know whether they will provide me with an approval to conduct my interviews and collect data. One of the problems fulfilled by me was the limited time allocated as the questionnaires were process oriented and it took time to hump some of the questionnaires while each interview was allocated 45 minutes only, in addition, the geographical location of the company was presented a difficulty as I had to travel more than 30 minutes to reach the companys premises.I had to visit the company twice to conduct a focus group with one team and a semi-structured interview with another team manager. I believe there is no issue in data integrity or accuracy that was provided to me by the team during both interviews. However, compilation of data has been ti me consuming process due to documenting all notes taking as well as referring to the audio tape recorder to insure that I havent missed anything out. I did not encounter any non-response or outright refusal from the participants. The response from the leaders and officials was also encouraging.How would you change the research instrument ground on the data you undisturbed? I believe the answers I have got are as good as the questions I asked, I may need to expand on my research instruments techniques and get the outmatch answers that fit my questions, or follow formative research process that will help me think through which questions I want to ask of which people. For example, enquire good questions of the wrong people or asking the right people bad questions will provide me poor and unusable results.Even if focus group and semi-structured interviews are the best method for collecting my data, I will consider changing how to do them, collecting the best data possible is to se parate research instruments into smaller rounds instead of move to get all answer for the questions at once. Later rounds can make on information from earlier rounds. For example, I would use one round of the interview to help me determine a target group, understand their portions, skills and fellowship around using systems and processes and then a second round to canvass more deeply into the groups thoughts and feelings.What lessons have you learned about collecting data? I believe collecting data for this study or MRP research is way more stressful than other data collection I have experienced. First of all, the stakes are higher, if I dont get it right I will impact to be in purgatory. All what I needed is to hear from my potential participants about whether they are participating in my research study. I got lashings of questions from the senior management asking details of the research study and proposal. This, however, does not mean that they are going to participate in my study. So, I had to be very careful about how I answer their questions and how to interact with them. I learned to be always prepared to get tones of questions. I also had to send my participants a reminder about the date and time of the interviews and reserve them, otherwise they will forget as they are busy people.I learned to keep my spirit high, and I needed to remind myself that things are going to be OK. I needed to continue providing information, checking in, reminding, answering questions, displace e-mails, making phone calls, and running my research study with a make a face on my face. Even though I was exhausted, tried to keep my zipper high, and didnt let my participants feel the stress I felt inside. At the end, I was grateful to have each and every participant I had and enjoyed the experience with them. And finally I learned to be patient, collecting data is a slow process and I was focusing on how to deliver the goods the big goal of interviewing participants a nd collecting data, while I forget to behave attention to what I achieve everyday towards getting my data collection complete.What thoughts do you have about the importance and relevance of your stick out based on the data collection experience? info collected during the focus group and interview is adequate to be analysed for my process benefit project purpose and to make decisions about important issues. I will be able to present findings and analysis based on data collected from interviews and that subsequent decisions based on arguments embodied in the findings are valid. Data collection process will help my project identifying area for improvements, analysing and assessing the importance of systems and processes.Quality and type of data play a vital role in supplying objective information for the problems in process improvement project so that some analytical understanding of the problems and hence solutions can be obtained. Making decision on the basis of poor whole step data is risky and may lead to disastrous results. My project requires data that is valid and reliable, and in this study data was collected using a variety of research methods, such as interview and focus group were participants debriefed to ensure interpretive validity in order to determine if data was being interpreted correctly.