.

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Congressional Earmarks

In financial year 2008, there were 11,524 earmarks totaling $16,501,833,000 for appropriations accounts. A congressional earmark is a provision that directs monetary resource to be spent on peculiar(prenominal) projects. Congressional earmarks should be banned and the new cash should be returned to the citizens. The largest Disadvantage of congressional earmarks that I hind end see is the add together of capital they use. An earmark on an Alaskan highway bill was for a link, that took money from hurricane reconstruction.This bridge would have cost $320 million. As federal taxpayers would you similar to pay $320 million, by way of trine separate earmarks? These three earmarks where added to the highway bill in 2005. These earmarks managed to sign on almost $223 million from a reconstruction project for a bridge in Louisiana. According to the 2010 copy of the Congressional grunter Book , it showed almost 9,200 earmarks totaling $16. 5 billion dollars. Even though that is a 10. % reject from 2009, the fact that we are trillions of dollars in debt and we are using the money to fund projects like the Monroe County Farmers Market in Kentucky and The second largest disadvantage that I can see from the use of earmarks is the humiliation and shame they can bring. The bridge above that is mentioned took money for hurricane reconstruction. This project is a humiliation to the population of Alaska and the U. S. Congress some people say. roughly people view the bridge as an object of national ridicule and a symbol of the fiscal irresponsibility of more in Congress toward the money entrusted to them by the taxpayers.In response to this national humiliation, more in Alaska have vented their rage in the states newspapers, and the papers editors have also objected to the bridge on their editorial pages. According to http//www. heritage. org David Raskin of Homer, Alaska, wrote, Alaskans owe an apology to the people of New Orleans, to Alaska native-born p eople and to the Nation for their selfish nearsightedness in sending these scoundrels to Washington and choose to keep them there.

No comments:

Post a Comment