Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

Case survey ExampleGiven the massive size and scale of the corruption, do you feel that the punishment was acceptable? Considering the order of magnitude of the corruption witnesses in virtually all Siemens subsidiaries across the globe, I strongly feel that the US and the German g overnments grossly under-fined the German attach to especially considering that at the time, Siemens used to accrue over over70 billion Euros of sales annually. A miniature fine of only $ 1.6 billion did only encourage the company to perpetuate the already worse un estimable behavior by bribing the US investigators. Had the regulating authorities natter a much heavier fine on Siemens, the company management and to an extension its employees, would comport taken a second thought as far as massive corruption and bribery are concerned. If you were the natural Chief Ethics Officer, how would you have handled the situation? As the new Chief Ethics Officer, I would have taken a slightly different course in that instead of summarily dismissing culpable employees, I would have engaged them in the reform process. Since there is no absolute respectable standard or person, the first step would have been to embark on massive employee training process, sensitizing, and enlightening the employees on the benefits of conducting themselves in accordance to acceptable ethical standards. By indulging all the concerned parties in extensive consultations, communications, and negotiations, I think I would have brought back the company to its original course much faster. This is because empowering and encouraging employees has the boilersuit effect of transforming the employees culture and subsequently, the organizations culture, for the better (Fernando, 2010). Was the corruption justified since bribery was legal in Germany until 1999? Before the German government put a ban on bribery and somatic corruption, some companies perceived this as an easy way of going about their business operations. Sin gled out was the electronics giant, Siemens, which took absolute usefulness of the situation in order to gain undue matched advantage. Several reports quote Siemens diadem executives insinuating that corruption and bribery gave the company the competitive edge that saw it stay ahead of the game for years. As some may want to believe that Siemens was compliant by engaging in corruption, it beat logic to deny that this act is unethical. By all standards of fairness, any acts of corruption and bribery amount to the good luck of acceptable ethical codes of conduct (Twomey et al., 2011). Ethics and moral justice should prevail in all corporate affairs and no company can justify corruption and bribery as a outline for achieving company objectives. This is especially so if the acts of corruption and bribery infringe on the rights of other equally competitive companies like the right to fairly and transparently compete for tenders and contracts. Therefore, whatever reason Siemens refe rred to, there is not a single justification for their unethical behavior (Twomey et al., 2011). How does an organization make the shift to refine their ethical practices when there is such a radical change in policy? It is no doubt that ethical recovery is an agonizing experience for just about companies especially if they were operating on a global platform. However, most organizations do manage to refine their ethical practices after a radical policy change. This, they achieve by following certain approaches that range from transforming the