Summary of 3 Men in a Boat Essay Example for Free

Summary of 3 Men in a Boat stressThree Men in a Boat is a deceptively simple story trine friends take a gravy holdering holiday on the River Thames. At root sight this does not front a likely plot for a classic work of comedy, and the position that it was written in the latterly capital of Seychellesn period and was an instant bestseller seems even harder to believe. Nowadays a sense of humour does not instantaneously spring to mind as a defining characteristic of the Victorians, particular as Queen Victoria herself is famous for the remark, We be not amused Jerome K. Jerome later wrote, I did not intend to write a funny book, at first. I did not know I was a humorist. I never beat been sure about it. In the middle ages, I should probably rush gone about sermon and got myself burnt or hanged. Although the book was a huge success with the reading public, Jerome was lucky that it was not killed transfer by the reviews. Of course it was damned by the critics, Jerome o bserved. One might have imagined to read some of them that the British Empire was in danger.One Church dignitary went about the country denouncing me. Punch was especially indignant, scenting an baneful attempt to introduce current humour into comic literature. The humour lies not in the plot, entirely in the detail. A relaxing holiday on the river, rowing and sailing upstream, seeing the sights, and camping in the boat during overnight stops what could possibly go wrong? The answer, of course, is just about everything, and it is the antics of the three men with their differering attitudes and approaches to the divers(a) problems that make the book so funny. On the periphery, there is also the dog Montmorency, a thoroughly lawless figure whose practical solution to their difficulties usually consists of needting out of the focal point until all the fuss dies down. roughly of the humour comes from comic set pieces, such as the agony of putting up a camp out in adverse w eather conditions. In some contingencys, episodes that still raise a laugh (because they are based on perennial problems like finding the correct train at a railway station) were actually topical jokes.Waterloo station was considered a confusing mess of platforms that it was al about impossible to find your way around, and the idea of bribing a train driver to take you wherever you want to go appeals as overmuch to the modern railway user as it did to the Victorians. Indeed, the whole book was topical, because a river boating holiday had save become fashionable a decade before, and part of the books success was due to the fact that boating on the Thames was the latest craze at the time it was published. The book also broke new ground with its subject matter and with its protagonists. The most frequent books of the day were generally adventures with dashing heroes, by roots such as H. Rider Haggard, Rudyard Kipling and Robert Louis Stevenson. A book about three ordinary men an d their minor but hilarious adventures on the river was something totally new. Also new was the structure of the book, though whether by accident or design is unclear. The structure is completely unbalanced, since it takes the first quarter of the book to discuss and plan the set out and conquer them onto the river, while the return journey is wrapped up in just eleven pages.The trip on the river is sincerely just a frame on which to hang the various anecdotes and digressions that contain much of the humour. At intervals, and often sitting uncomfortably within the string of anecdotes and incidents, Jerome provides straight descriptive passages in a pathfinder style, noting the places they are passing and their history. Sometimes he overdoes things, with fantasies such as a long description of how great power John signed the Magna Carta at Runnymede. He seems to be stressful to convey the idle thoughts and flights of fancy godly by locations of such historical importance, but t his does not always work. In general, his shorter descriptions succeed far fail in creating the illusion of a real trip on the river. Jerome was very well acquainted with the river, having do many trips on it with friends and even spending his honeymoon there with his new bride, immediately before musical composition the book.He certainly drew on previous experiences, and the three men he writes about had real counterparts Jerome himself was the narrator J., George was based on a George Wingrave, and Harris on Carl Hentschel. Only the dog, Montmorency, was entirely imaginary. Perhaps the key to the success of Three Men in a Boat lies in its combination of simplicity and set-piece humorous incidents, most of which have a timeless, universal appeal. The book has been translated into many languages and repeatedly adapted for television. It is probably as popular today as when first published, because much of the language seems so fresh and modern.The book is narrated in the first p erson by the author, who is refered to as J by his friends. It begins with J, and his friends harris and George, deciding to take a boat trip up the Thames from Kingston to oxford,and then cover version again (the book was written in 1888, when boating on the Thames was enormously popular). They are unanimous in agreeing that this is a good idea (except for Js dog, Montmorency, who doesnt care for boating).They have disconcert getting packed, and in the morning Harris and J take a train to Kingston, where the boat is waiting for them. George is connectedness them later when he has finished his work at the bank. they row up passt Hampton Court, where Harris describes an incident when he got muzzy in Hampton Court maze with some friends (this is one of the funniest parts of the book).George joines the party, and they have trouble towing the boat, and later they have even more trouble trying to put the cover over the boat for the night. they all get fed up with each other, but chee r up when they have a good tea. on that point is a long passage about the signing of Magna Carta (there are several passages like this in the book, where the author gets serious for a bit).They have various other mishaps as they travel up the river, like the time when they are having tinned pineapple for tea, and cant find the tin-opener. They spend a lot of time trying to open it with no success. And there are stories of other trips they made up the river, like the time J was ou tin a aboat with his cousin, and they thought they were going crazy because they couldnt find Wallingford Lock (it turns out the lock had been dismantled some years earlier). And ther ere is the time when they are in an inn which has a stuffed trout in a case on the wall, and several different people come in and claim to have been the one who caught it, but when George stands on a chair to look at it, he knocks it down and it breaks it turns out to be affix of ParisWhen they reach Oxford, and start to t ravel bac, it starts to rain, and they arent enjoying themselves somuch. So they abandon the boat and take the train back to London, where they go to a show and then have a good dinner in a restaurant. They make a toast Heres to three men well out of a boat